Recommendations for Improving the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainty by the IPCC

Toward a revamping of climate damage estimates in IPCC AR6

Fast, cheap, and imperfect? US public opinion about solar geoengineering

Potentially large equilibrium climate sensitivity tail uncertainty

Reply to Cox et al. (2018), Nature 553 (7688), 319-322.

Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis

Renewables decreased U.S. CO2 emissions by 2.3–3.3% from 2007-13, roughly matching the 2.5–3.6% from natural gas.

Ramsey discounting calls for subtracting climate damages from economic growth rates

Underwriting 1.5°C

Competitive approaches to financing accelerated climate change mitigation

Policy sequencing toward decarbonization

Economics 101 says price carbon. Economics 102 says subsidize R&D. Political Economy 101 points to policies that support clean technology deployment.

Solar Geoengineering and the Chemtrails Conspiracy on Social Media

Chemtrails are not real. The conspiracy very much is.

Solar geoengineering reduces atmospheric carbon burden

Solar geoengineering is no substitute for cutting emissions, but could nevertheless help reduce the atmospheric carbon burden. In the extreme, if solar geoengineering were used to hold radiative forcing constant under RCP8.5, the carbon burden may be reduced by ~100 GTC, equivalent to 12–26% of twenty-first-century emissions at a cost of under US$0.5 per tCO2.

Night-time lights: A global, long term look at links to socio-economic trends

A retrospective look at the global, long-term relationships between night-time lights and a series of socio-economic indicators

«
»
Newer
Older

Keep in touch.