ZEIT-Gipfel: „Die Energiewende in Österreich“

Live auf Puls24

Der Standard: „Wie werden wir Putins Gas los – und wer zahlt den Preis dafür?“

Videodiskussion

Zeit für solares Geoengineering?

Solares Geoengineering ist riskant – sehr riskant sogar. Dasselbe gilt aber auch für die Abhängigkeit von fossilen Brennstoffen und den Klimawandel. Trotzdem emittieren wir weiterhin CO2. Nehmen wir das richtige Risiko in Kauf?

IMF Independent Evaluation Office

IEO Seminar series

Cut off Russian gas

Instead of waiting until 2030, Europe should rip the Band-Aid off now

White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

Roundtable

Foreign Service Institute

U.S. State Department

Daily Climate Damage Should Feel More Like a Disaster

One-off events like Deepwater Horizon leave a lasting impression, but the normal burning of fossil fuels has an even worse impact.

ClimateWire: “Here comes the social cost of carbon. Will it address EJ?”

By Jean Chemnick

UPenn Kleinman Center for Energy Policy

Philadelphia, PA

U.S. Environmental and Health rules pay for themselves—and then some

The regulations’ benefits outweigh their costs. That means we’re not maximizing their potential.

Axios: “A carbon quandary escape hatch”

By Ben Geman

Private-sector progress accelerates

New carbon removal funds show the private sector is stepping up on climate, and that’s reason for optimism.

Grist: “Why high gas prices aren’t necessarily good for the climate”

By Shannon Osaka

Morgan Stanley

Climate Change University

Roosevelt House

Hunter College

Helping people hurt from high energy prices

Hint: Reducing them isn’t the answer.

How do we fix it? What The War in Ukraine Means for Climate Change

Conversation with Richard Davies and Jim Meigs

New Statesman: “The trillion-dollar question”

By Sarah Dawood

«
»
Newer
Older

Keep in touch.