University of Bergen

Bergen, Norway

Harvard-Tsinghua Workshop

Beijing, China

Solar Geoengineering and the Chemtrails Conspiracy on Social Media

Chemtrails are not real. The conspiracy very much is.

Harvard Kennedy School Executive Education

Cambridge, MA

Climate Engineering Conference 2017

Berlin, Germany

“Uncertainty Is No Excuse: Gernot Wagner on Climate Engineering”

by Timothy James Dimacali

Global Risk Institute

Toronto, Canada

Knight Science Journalism Seminar

Cambridge, MA

iSEE Congress 2017

Urbana-Champaign, Illinois

Solar geoengineering reduces atmospheric carbon burden

Solar geoengineering is no substitute for cutting emissions, but could nevertheless help reduce the atmospheric carbon burden. In the extreme, if solar geoengineering were used to hold radiative forcing constant under RCP8.5, the carbon burden may be reduced by ~100 GTC, equivalent to 12–26% of twenty-first-century emissions at a cost of under US$0.5 per tCO2.

Zehn Ideen für eine grüne Wende

Von Alois Pumhösel

Ö1 Mittagsjournal: Das perfekte Problem

Gespräch mit Robert Czepel

Klimawandel: “Leider ist es schon verdammt spät”

KURIER-Gespräch mit Susanne Mauthner-Weber

Fast, cheap, and imperfect? US public opinion about solar geoengineering

6th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists

Gothenburg, Sweden

Universität Wien Semesterfrage

Vienna, Austria

Energy Transition Show: Environmental Economics

Conversation with Chris Nelder

Chemtrails Are Not the Geoengineering Debate We Should Be Having (Because They’re Not Real)

Around 60 percent of all social media discourse on geoengineering is conspiratorial, and belief in the conspiracy appears across party lines.

„Der Zug ist abgefahren. Es geht darum so rasch wie möglich aufzuspringen“

Gespräch mit Benjamin Enajat

«
»
Newer
Older

Keep in touch.