Cambridge, MA
October 20th, 2017
October 20th, 2017
Cambridge, MA
October 10th, 2017
Berlin, Germany
October 4th, 2017
Toronto, Canada
September 26th, 2017
Cambridge, MA
September 19th, 2017
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
Nature Climate Change
Solar geoengineering is no substitute for cutting emissions, but could nevertheless help reduce the atmospheric carbon burden. In the extreme, if solar geoengineering were used to hold radiative forcing constant under RCP8.5, the carbon burden may be reduced by ~100 GTC, equivalent to 12–26% of twenty-first-century emissions at a cost of under US$0.5 per tCO2.
August 28th, 2017
Alpbach, Austria
August 21st, 2017
Gestaltung: Barbara Riedl-Daser
July 29th, 2017
Kent, Connecticut
July 27th, 2017
Newry, ME
Environmental Politics
June 26th, 2018
Gothenburg, Sweden
June 11th, 2018
Vienna, Austria
May 2nd, 2018
Conversation with Chris Nelder
Earther
Around 60 percent of all social media discourse on geoengineering is conspiratorial, and belief in the conspiracy appears across party lines.
Die Furche
Gespräch mit Benjamin Enajat
The Wall Street Journal
Pumping aerosols into the stratosphere may buy us more time, but it’s no substitute for cutting carbon emissions—and we still don’t know enough to do it responsibly.
December 9th, 2017
Pasadena, CA
November 30th, 2017
Bergen, Norway