Berlin, Germany
October 10th, 2017
October 10th, 2017
Berlin, Germany
September 21st, 2017
Conversation about the day's business news on BBC World Service show
September 19th, 2017
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
Nature Climate Change
Solar geoengineering is no substitute for cutting emissions, but could nevertheless help reduce the atmospheric carbon burden. In the extreme, if solar geoengineering were used to hold radiative forcing constant under RCP8.5, the carbon burden may be reduced by ~100 GTC, equivalent to 12–26% of twenty-first-century emissions at a cost of under US$0.5 per tCO2.
August 30th, 2017
Conversation with Richard Davies and Jim Meigs
August 30th, 2017
Alpbach, Austria
August 29th, 2017
Gaming, Austria
August 28th, 2017
Alpbach, Austria
August 22nd, 2017
Alpbach, Austria
August 20th, 2017
Alpbach, Austria
April 18th, 2019
Moving to Economics 102 often reverses fundamental Econ 101 answers around cutting carbon emissions. Might the same be true—in reverse—when moving from Solar Geoengineering 101 to 102?
April 7th, 2019
Rochester, NY
February 26th, 2019
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Nature Sustainability
Today, more than ever, ‘Spaceship Earth’ is an apt metaphor as we chart the boundaries for a safe planet. What can social scientists contribute to this conversation?
Foreign Policy
Efforts to combat climate change should be pragmatic above all else.
Annals of Economics and Statistics
A new conceptual framework for the age-old prescriptivism-versus-descriptivism debate
November 29th, 2018
Washington, DC
Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper
The massive uncertainties afflicting climate change should be a prod to policy action.
October 14th, 2018
Gespräch mit Judith Hecht