Carbon removal industry calls on U.S. government for regulation in new industry report
by Isabella O'Malley

by Isabella O'Malley
by Julia Simon
by Sarah DeWeerdt
Göttingen, Germany
As long as coal plants are still operating, it is a good idea to require them capture their carbon dioxide emissions. But those designing policies to hasten such practices must tread carefully, lest they unwittingly extend the life of dirtier energy sources.
To think that technology will save us from climate change is to invite riskier behavior, or moral hazard. Whether a climate technology creates new problems has little to do with the solution, and everything to do with us.
Gespräch mit Ruth Ciesinger
Boulder, Colorado
Use the attention paid to the underlying environmental problem to actively invoke the opposite: 'inverse moral hazards'.
New York, NY
Climate Change University
University Park, PA
Harvard Medical School
The severity of the climate crisis necessitates a new look at nuclear power
Research into unproven technofixes isn’t a replacement for eliminating emissions, even if the debate over geoengineering is stuck on that concern.
A simple model of climate negotiations shows how the mere threat of risky geoengineering might help induce a high-mitigation agreement.
The core question is whether any kind of technofix that sustains fossil-fueled capitalism and the status quo can be considered “green.”
Moral hazard [ˈmôrəl ˈhazərd, noun]—The lack of incentive to guard against risk when one is protected from its consequences.