Moral hazard
Geoengineering: the Gamble — an afternoon with Dr. Gernot Wagner
Stony Book, New York
New Yorker: "Why the Time Has Finally Come for Geothermal Energy"
by Rivka Galchen
Carbon removal industry calls on U.S. government for regulation in new industry report
by Isabella O'Malley
NPR: "Startups want to geoengineer a cooler planet. With few rules, experts see big risks"
by Julia Simon
Economic Times: "Companies now know climate risks mean financial risks — industrial sectors need swift decarbonisation"
Interview with Srijana Mitra Das
Anthropocene Magazine: "Does discussing geoengineering derail climate action? New study puts it to the test."
by Sarah DeWeerdt
Presenting balanced geoengineering information has little effect on mitigation engagement
by Christine Merk and Gernot Wagner
Max-Planck-Institut
Göttingen, Germany
Carbon Capture and Delay
As long as coal plants are still operating, it is a good idea to require them capture their carbon dioxide emissions. But those designing policies to hasten such practices must tread carefully, lest they unwittingly extend the life of dirtier energy sources.
How to Think About Climate-Tech Solutions
To think that technology will save us from climate change is to invite riskier behavior, or moral hazard. Whether a climate technology creates new problems has little to do with the solution, and everything to do with us.
Tagesspiegel: „Das moralische Risiko ist ein riesiges Problem“
Gespräch mit Ruth Ciesinger
MIT Technology Review: Researchers launched a solar geoengineering test flight in the UK last fall
by James Temple
University of Colorado, Boulder
Boulder, Colorado
Green Moral Hazards
by Gernot Wagner and Daniel Zizzamia
Council on Foreign Relations
New York, NY
Morgan Stanley
Climate Change University
Penn State
University Park, PA
HMS Bioethics seminar
Harvard Medical School
